Current York City
- Employment Law (Plaintiff)
NY Division of Human Rights How to read this firm's data
How to read this firm's data
Header tiles
Rank Position among firms named in the category's latest scan.
Response mention rate The percentage of latest-snapshot AI responses that named this business. ±X is the 95% confidence margin.
Cited by How many of the four AI assistants named this firm at least once.
Breakdowns + log
90-day trend Each dot is one category snapshot.
Per-AI breakdown Responses from each assistant that named this firm.
By question type Citations grouped by what the buyer was asking.
Citation log Every recorded instance where an AI named this firm.
Full methodology →
Unverified listing
AI assistants named this firm, but Viclaro doesn't yet have a verified business record for it — the ranking reflects citations only. If this is your firm, claim the listing below and we'll reach out from
[email protected] to verify.
Your name Email Your role — select — Owner / founding partner Partner Attorney at the firm Marketing / operations Other
Anything we should know? (optional)
We don't share this. Used only to verify the listing.
Rank
#13
of 320 firms
Response mention rate
2.7%
±1.4% (95% confidence)
Cited by
2/4
✓ Claude ✗ ChatGPT ✗ Gemini ✓ Perplexity
Per-AI breakdown
Empty cards = that AI assistant doesn't surface this firm. A firm cited by only one AI is likely invisible to most buyers.
Claude
11
mentions
ChatGPT
0
mentions
Gemini
0
mentions
Perplexity
4
mentions
By question type
Citations split by buyer-intent category. Empty rows = AI doesn't think of this firm when buyers ask that kind of question.
Decision
3 mentions
Situation
12 mentions
Citation log
15 mentions recorded for this business in the latest snapshot.
Where NY Division of Human Rights is winning + missing, prompt-by-prompt
92 of 100 ranking-layer buyer prompts don't cite this firm. The three firms cited most on each missing prompt are the competitors closing that gap. Prompt text is redacted (see methodology
- 1. — buckets show the shape of the gap.
92 missing prompts Sorted by competitor citation weight P-001
Validation
Firms Cited On This Prompt:
Wigdor LLP ×8 Fox News ×3 Chambers ×2
P-002
Follow Up
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Outten & Golden LLP ×8 Wigdor LLP ×1 Boutique Firm X ×1
P-003
Validation
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Outten & Golden LLP ×8 Martindale-Hubbell ×1 Chambers ×1
P-004
Decision
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Wigdor LLP ×8 Outten & Golden LLP ×6 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×5
P-005
Validation
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Liddle & Robinson ×8 Outten & Golden LLP ×4 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×2
P-006
Validation
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Outten & Golden LLP ×8 Wigdor LLP ×8 Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC ×8
P-007
Decision
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Outten & Golden LLP ×8 Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C. ×4 Joseph Law Group, P.C. ×2
P-008
Decision
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Wigdor LLP ×7 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×5 Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC ×4
P-009
Validation
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Filippatos PLLC ×7 Martindale-Hubbell ×2 Avvo ×2
P-010
Decision
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Wigdor LLP ×7 Outten & Golden LLP ×2 Phillips Nizer LLP ×2
P-011
Decision
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Outten & Golden LLP ×6 Wigdor LLP ×6 Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC ×3
P-012
Decision
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Labaton Sucharow LLP ×6 Phillips & Cohen LLP ×5 Zuckerman Law ×4
P-013
Situation
Firms Cited On This Prompt: New York State Nurses Association (NYSNA) ×6 NY Attorney General ×3 New York State Department of Health ×2
P-014
Decision
Firms Cited On This Prompt: Outten & Golden LLP ×6 Joseph Law Group, P.C. ×5 Virginia & Ambinder, LLP ×4
P-015
Decision
Firms Cited On This Prompt: New York City Bar Association ×4 New York State Bar Association ×3 Avvo ×2
- 77 more missing prompts.
The full list — with the verbatim prompt text and every cited firm — is part of a Viclaro audit.
8 winning prompts Prompts where AI cited this firm W-001
Situation
Also Cited On This Prompt: New York State Division of Human Rights ×7 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ×6 NYC Commission on Human Rights ×6
W-002
Decision
Also Cited On This Prompt: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ×6 Legal Aid Society ×4 Legal Aid Society ×4
W-003
Situation
Also Cited On This Prompt: NYC Commission on Human Rights ×5 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ×4 Terc Law Offices, P.C. ×3
W-004
Situation
Also Cited On This Prompt: NYC Commission on Human Rights ×5 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ×4 American Diabetes Association ×2
W-005
Situation
Also Cited On This Prompt: United Federation of Teachers ×5 Office of Special Investigations ×5 Terc Law Offices, P.C. ×4
W-006
Situation
Also Cited On This Prompt: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ×4 Terc Law Offices, P.C. ×3 NYC Commission on Human Rights ×3
W-007
Decision
Also Cited On This Prompt: Wigdor LLP ×4 Outten & Golden LLP ×4 Phillips Nizer LLP ×3
W-008
Situation
Also Cited On This Prompt: American Medical Association ×2 American College of Surgeons ×2 Terc Law Offices, P.C. ×2
Peer firms in New York City employment law (plaintiff)
Other firms ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name in this category.
#1
Outten & Golden LLP
27.8% share
- 4/4 AI
#2
Wigdor LLP
23.6% share
- 4/4 AI
#3
Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight
13.6% share
- 4/4 AI
#4 Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC
10.9% share
- 4/4 AI
#5
Phillips Nizer LLP
8.9% share
- 3/4 AI
#6 Phillips & Associates | Sexual Harassment, Discrimination, & Employment Lawyers
8.2% share
- 3/4 AI
#7 Joseph Law Group, P.C.
5.1% share
- 3/4 AI
#8 Terc Law Offices, P.C.
4.2% share
- 3/4 AI
See the full Employment Law (Plaintiff) ranking → Want to climb the rankings?
We'll show you the exact content competitors published that earned their citations — and the specific answer blocks + schema markup for NY Division of Human Rights to outrank them.
Get a full audit →
📌 NY Division of Human Rights (Kumaon Division)
🏢 Viclaro
📍 Kumaon Division