Field Risk Officer
EQU/FRO/1858247
Equitas Small Finance Bank
Risk Containment Unit > North > Rajasthan > Rajasthan > Jaipur > Udaipur > Rajasthan > 16059 > Udaipur

Posted On: 11 Sep 2026
End Date: 26 Sep 2026
Required Experience: 3 - 4 years

Share Register and Apply

Basic Section

- No. Of Openings: 1
- External Title: Field Risk Officer
- Employment Type: Permanent
- Employment Category: Field
- Closing Date: 26 Sep 2026

Organisational Section

- Entity: Equitas Small Finance Bank
- Business Unit: Assets
- Division/Function (SBU): Risk Containment Unit
- Department: RCU - IB
- Sub-Department: RCU - IB
- Generic Role: Field Risk Officer
- External Title (Job Role): Field Risk Officer
- Division: Risk Containment Unit
- Zone: North
- State: Rajasthan
- Region: Rajasthan
- Area: Jaipur
- Cluster: Udaipur
- PT Location: Rajasthan
- Branch Code: 16059
- Branch Name: Udaipur

Skills

- Skill: Customer Focus, Result Orientation with Execution Excellence
- Highest Education: Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Science, Bachelor of Technology
- Working Language: Hindi, English

Home Filed Risk Officer (53923)

Key Result Areas
Position: Field Risk Officer (FRO)
Weightage: 100%

High Performance Goals

S.NO. | DESIRED RESULT | WEIGHTAGE | KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR | |-------|----------------|-----------|----------------------------| | 1 | Field Visits - Target Vs Achievement | 25% | As per Annexure 1 | | 2 | Branch Visits - Target Vs Achievement | 25% | As per Annexure 2 | | 3 | Quality/effectiveness of risk activity | 20% | As per Annexure 3 | | 4 | Resolving all gaps / discrepancies identified as part of risk activity (Policy & Process Deviations) | 20% | As per Annexure 4 | | 5 | Self Development | 10% | As per Annexure 5 |





AnnexureAnnexure - 1

Rating Grid for FRO Field Visit - Target Vs Achievement

Scoring method | % of Achievement | |----------------|------------------| | 5 (Outstanding) | If actual achieved is 120% or above of target | | 4 (Excellent) | If actual achieved is between 111-120% of target | | 3 (Very Good) | If actual achieved is between 101-110% of target | | 2 (Good) | If actual achieved is 100% of target | | 1 (Adequate) | If actual achieved is below 100% of the target |

Annexure - 2

Rating Grid for FRO Branch Visit - Target Vs Achievement

Scoring method | % of Achievement | |----------------|------------------| | 5 (Outstanding) | If actual achieved is 120% or above of target | | 4 (Excellent) | If actual achieved is between 111-120% of target | | 3 (Very Good) | If actual achieved is between 101-110% of target | | 2 (Good) | If actual achieved is 100% of target | | 1 (Adequate) | If actual achieved is below 100% of the target |

Annexure - 3

Rating Grid for FRO Quality/Effectiveness of Risk activity

Scoring method | % of Achievement | |----------------|------------------| | 5 (Outstanding) | No critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY, which is not reported by FRO/RFRO. | | 4 (Excellent) | One critical audit observation raised by internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM)



during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO. | | 3 (Very Good) | 2 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO. | | 2 (Good) | 3 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO. | | 1 (Adequate) | More than 3 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (TRM/ARM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO. |

Annexure - 4

Rating Grid for FRO - Resolving all gaps / discrepancies identified as part of risk activity (Policy & Process Deviations)

Scoring method | % of Achievement | |----------------|------------------| | 5 (Outstanding) | No compliance related/process gap/audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits/ARM/TRM during FY. | | 4 (Excellent) | Not more than 2 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits/ARM/TRM during FY. | | 3 (Very Valuable) | 3 to 4 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits/ARM/TRM during FY. | | 2 (Good) | 5 to 6 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits/ARM/TRM during FY. | | 1 (Adequate) | More than 6 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits/ARM/TRM during FY. |

Annexure 5

Scoring method | Average Mandays of Training per Team Member | |----------------|---------------------------------------------| | 5 (Outstanding) | >=3 | | 4 (Excellent) | 2.5-2.99 | | 3 (Very Good) | 2-2.49 | | 2 (Good) | 1-1.99 | | 1 (Adequate) | <1 |

📌 Skill (Jaipur)
🏢 Equitas Micro Finance India
📍 Jaipur