4Resolving all gaps / discrepancies identified as part of risk activity(Policy & Process Deviations)20%
As per Annexure 4
5Self Development10%
As per Annexure 5
AnnexureAnnexure - 1 - Rating Grid for FRO Field Visit - Target Vs AchievementScoring method5
(Outstanding)4
(Excellent)3
(Very Good)2
(Good)1
(Adequate)% of AchievementIf actual achieved is 120% or above of targetIf actual achieved is between 111-120% of targetIf actual achieved is between 101-110% of targetIf actual achieved is 100% of targetIf actual achieved is below 100% of the target
Annexure - 2 - Rating Grid for FRO Branch Visit - Target Vs AchievementScoring method5
(Outstanding)4
(Excellent)3
(Very Positive)2
(Good)1
(Adequate)% of AchievementIf actual achieved is 120% or above of targetIf actual achieved is between 111-120% of targetIf actual achieved is between 101-110% of targetIf actual achieved is 100% of targetIf actual achieved is below 100% of the target
Annexure - 3 - Rating Grid for FRO Quality/Effectiveness of Risk activityScoring method5
(Outstanding)4
(Excellent)3
(Very Good)2
(Good)1
(Adequate)% of AchievementNo critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY,
which is not reported by FRO/RFRO.One critical audit observations raised by internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO.2 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO.3 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO.More than 3 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (TRM/ARM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO.
Annexure - 4 - Rating Grid for FRO - Resolving all gaps / discrepancies identified as part of risk activity(Policy & Process Deviations)Scoring method5
(Outstanding)4
(Excellent)3
(Very Good)2
(Good)1
(Adequate)% of AchievementNo compliance related/process gap/ audit queries, raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM /TRM during FY.Not more than 2 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM /TRM during FY.3 to 4 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM / TRM during FY.5 to 6 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM /TRM during FY.More than 6 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM/TRM during FY.
Annexure 5Scoring method5
(Outstanding)4
(Excellent)3
(Very Good)2
(Good)1
(Adequate)Average Mandays of Training per Team Member>=32.5-2.992-2.491-1.99<1
📌 Field Risk Officer (Jaipur)
🏢 equitas small finance bank
📍 Jaipur
Reply to this offer
Impress this employer describing Your skills and abilities, fill out the form below and leave Your personal touch in the presentation letter.